A Study on Allegorical Narration and the Art of Argumentation in the Prose of Pre-Qin Philosophers

Abstract

In the evolution of Pre-Qin philosophical prose from the aphoristic style to the expository style, the incorporation of allegorical narration constitutes a pivotal juncture in generic transformation. Within the context of argumentation, allegory employs fictional narrative as a vehicle for rational persuasion, forming a deep mutual constitution with the art of argumentation. This study is developed across three dimensions: the fusion of genres, argumentative strategies, and the presentation of thought. The narrative turn enables allegory to acquire argumentative efficacy beyond that of mere exemplification; metaphorical reasoning, counterfactual narration, and the structure of dialogic refutation constitute the core mechanisms of argumentative strategy; and shifts in perspective, narrative control, and allegorical presentation realize a cognitive shift in the expression of thought. The study demonstrates that narrative elements are not merely ornamental adjuncts to argumentation but rather constitute the textual matrix through which the art of argumentation is realized. The deep isomorphism between narrative structure and argumentative structure reflects the Pre-Qin philosophers' conscious exploration of argumentative methods.